This, in my opinion, is an example of this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6QXx3igtoM&feature=g-u-u
In this example a caller on a radio show proves to know quite a bit more about the Bible than the host, conservative blogger Dana Loesch, bargained for.
Though the caller seems to be making points, Dana finds it kosher to attack the caller with louder and louder shrills even going so far as to state that she must provide proof that her claim that Jesus spoke about homosexuality is not true. She even then goes so far as to say that the burden of proof lies on the person who she charges must prove a negative. The fact remains that the Jesus of the Bible said nothing on homosexuality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6QXx3igtoM&feature=g-u-u
In this example a caller on a radio show proves to know quite a bit more about the Bible than the host, conservative blogger Dana Loesch, bargained for.
Though the caller seems to be making points, Dana finds it kosher to attack the caller with louder and louder shrills even going so far as to state that she must provide proof that her claim that Jesus spoke about homosexuality is not true. She even then goes so far as to say that the burden of proof lies on the person who she charges must prove a negative. The fact remains that the Jesus of the Bible said nothing on homosexuality.